
-Courtesy of Google Images
As I stated earlier on this blog, I recently returned from Amsterdam, a city of sin located deep within the Netherlands. In addition to it's beautiful canals and amazing architecture, most people know the city for another reason. Both prostitution and marijuana posession are not convictable crimes. I was in the city during the heart of Spring Break and it was quite a sight to behold as hundreds of tourists engaged in acitvities that would have American police running in circles, and they were doing it in the middle of the street.
While possesion of large amounts of the drug or growing and distributing it without a license is a punishable crime, police do not arrest or even bother people indulging in small amounts of the substance. This has long been a subject of debate about whether or not the Dutch government is undermining the drug policies of other countries, including the U.S.. This point became implicitly clear after a very rough and unnecesary search at customs once returning to Seattle. Apparently the agent was having difficulty believing that a college student such as myself would travel alone to Amsterdam with any other purpose than trafficking drugs.
Despite the already controversial issue, a Dutch court made an even more bizzare move recently. An AP article revealed the fact that in The Hague, a judge ruled that it was ok for a man convicted of hashish smuggling, a serious crime even in the Netherlands, to right off the expenses of said smuggling on his tax return. The fisherman for who the precedent was set, was allowed to make the deduction from his income in the amount that it cost him to ship the drug to and from the country. The courts justification for the move was that he was only trafficking, and not distributing the controversial substance.
Although an odd set of events, many in the Netherlands and out believe the consumption of these drugs to be a victimless crime, but the question now is, should it be actually rewarded with lowered taxes. Many in the Netherlands are probably rejoicing, while governments elsewhere only groan at what this does to their drug struggle. In the end the only logical answer would be for a worldwide drug consensus to be reached, in which all nations reach the same conclusions and adopt the same laws, but that has been historically impossible and will probably never happen. Until that day, tourists will continue to be harassed and government confusion and inconsistencies will only increase.



